Engulfed in the turmoil stirred by criticism over the eligibility of Move Forward Party (MFP) chief Pita Limjaroenrat, the Election Commission (EC) staunchly defends its actions. Backed , together with Pita, have insinuated that he was not given the rightful opportunity to counter the allegations earlier than the case saw its day in court.
The EC, in a strong-worded statement, clarified that the considerations in query revolve round Pita’s standing as a Member of Parliament (MP). They said that belief and proof both level towards a cessation of his MP standing, due to sure specifics that warrant the annulment of such a place.
Further solidifying their stance, the EC accentuated that their actions strictly adhered to Section eighty two of the constitution. This specific enactment empowers them to promptly current a case to the Constitutional Court. The provision applies to situations when the EC, bolstered by tangible evidence, is satisfied that the MP status of a person has been rendered invalid as a consequence of circumstances mentioned within the constitution.
The EC justified its stance by referring to twins rulings from 2019 which were associated to the proceedings of Section 82 cases. The commission emphasised that they are beneath no obligation to summon Pita over the matter, permitting him a chance to handle the charges or present a defence. This alternative is due to be offered when the case is offered in court docket.
Further elaborating on the measures undertaken, the EC emphasized the thorough scrutiny that went into the exploration of Pita’s case. This in-depth examination led them to the choice of presenting the matter earlier than the court. The alternative was based mostly solely on the evidence and information found in the course of the antecedent fact-finding mission..